2HEFECTO DE SUELOS DE DIFERENTES GRANJAS DE CAMARON DE TEXAS EN EL CRECIMIENTO DE Penaeus vannamei

Authors

  • G., A. L. Lawrence Texas A&M University System
  • T. M. Samocha Texas A&M University System
  • W. H. Neill Texas A&M University System

Abstract

Se cultivaron poslarvas de Penaeus vannamei (150 mg de peso promedio) durante 80 días en tanques interiores sin substrato o con suelo de estanques, de 5 granjas de camarón de Texas, pero con un suministro de agua en común (el canal de Port Aransas, TX). La ganancia en peso promedio para todos los tratamientos varió de 13.75 a 16.04 g. El crecimiento semanal para los días 1-30, 31-80 y 1-80 varió entre 1-02-1.14, 1.83-2.04 y 1.06-1.53 g, respectivamente. Aunque las diferencias en crecimiento de los camarones entre los diferentes tratamientos substratos fueron modestas, estuvieron altamente correlacionadas con la producción de camarón de años anteriores en los estanques de los cuales las muestras fueron obtenidas. Las regresiones de la producción ajustada de camarón del estanque (rendimiento de biomasa de camarón de un estanque particular, menos el rendimiento promedio de esa granja) sobre el crecimiento del camarón en el laboratorio, dieron correlaciones positivas significativas r = 0.73 (P = 0.041), r = 0.83 (P = 0.010), y r = 0.88 (P = 0.004) para los días 1-30, 31-80, y 1-80, respectivamente. Estos resultados demuestran un impacto del substrato sobre el crecimiento de los camarones independiente del suministro de agua. En estanques y otros sistemas cuasi estáticos, el impacto del substrato sobre la producción del camarón puede ser mucho más dramático que en los tanques con flujo continuo usados en el experimento que aquí se describe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayub, M. , Boyd, C. E. and Teichert, C. D. 1993. Effects of urea application, aeration, and

drying on total carbon concentrations in pond bottom soils. The Prog. FishCulturist, 55:210-213.

Aziz, K. A. and Greenwood, J. G. 1982. Response of juvenile Metapenaeus bennettae Rcek &

Dall, 1965 (Decapoda, Penaeidae) to sediments of differing particle size. Crustaceana,

(2):121-126.

Bagchi, S. , Haque, A., and Acharjee, S. 1990. Effect of pond soil on fish. Environ. and Ecol.,

(3):1037-1038.

Banerjea, S. M. 1967. Water quality and soil condition of fish ponds in some states of India in

relation to fish production. Ind. J. Fish., 14:113-144.

Boddeke, R. 1983. Survival strategies of penaeid shrimps and their significance for shrimp

culture. pp. 514-523 In: G. Rogers, R. Day and A. Lim eds., Proceedings o f

the First International Conference on Warmwater Aquaculture Crustacea.

Brigham Young University, Laie, Hawaii, 9-11 February, 1983.

Boyd, C. E. 1989. Water quality management and aeration in shrimp farming. Fisheries and

Allied Aquaculture Departmental Series No. 2,. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station,

Auburn University, Alabama, 83 p.

Boyd, C. E. 1990. Water Quality in Ponds for Aquaculture. Alabama Agricultural Experiment

Station, Auburn University, Alabama. 482 p.

Bray, W. A. and Lawrence, A. L. 1993. The effect of four substrates on growth and survival of

Penaeus vannamei at two salinities. Ciencias Marinas, 19(2):229-244.

Chen, J. C. and T. S. 1988. Acute toxicity of nitrate to tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon larvae.

Aquaculture 69:253-262.

Chien, Y. H. 1989. The management of sediment in prawn ponds. In:Proc.III Brazilian Shrimp

Farming Congress. Joao Pessoa-PB, Brazil.

Chien, Y. H. , Lai, H. T., and Chang, S. K. 1989. The effect of using steel-making waste slags as

substrates on shrimp Penaeus monodon reared in aquaria. Asian Fish. Sci., 2:147-161.

Chin, T. S. and J. C. Chen. 1987. Acute toxicity of ammonia to tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon

larvae. Aquaculture 66:247-253.

Dall, W. , Hill, B. J. ,Rothlisberg, P. C. and Sharples, D. J. 1990. Food and feeding. Pages 315-

in J.H.S. Blaxter and A.J. Sputhward, editors. The biology of the penaeidae. Advances

in Marine Biology, Vol. 27. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

Dempsey, A. C., Kitting, C. L., and Rosson, R. A. 1989. Bacterial variability among individual

penaeid shrimp digestive tracts. Crustaceana, 56(3): 266-278.

Fuss, M. C. Jr. 1964. Observation on burrowing behavior of the pink shrimp Penaeus duorarum

Burkenroad. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf. Carib., 14:62-73.

Fuss, M. C. Jr. and Ogren, L. H. 1966. Factors affecting activity and burrowing habits of the

pink shrimp Penaeus duorarum Burkenroad. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol. Lab. Woods Hole,.

:170-191.

Harris, J. M. 1993. The presence, nature, and role of gut microflora in aquatic invertebrates: a

synthesis. Microb. Ecol., 25:195-231.

Holithus, L. B. 1980. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 1. Shrimps and prawns of the world. An

annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fish. synon., 125(1) 261 p.

Liao, I. C. 1969. Study on the feeding of Kuruma prawn, Penaeus japonicus Bate.Collected

Reprints of the Tunkgan Mar. Lab.,1969-1971, 1:17-24.

Liao, I. C. and Chao, N. H. 1983. Development of prawn culture and its related studies in

Taiwan. pp. 127-142 In: G. Rogers, R. Day and A. Lim (eds.), Proceedings of the First

International Conference on Warmwater Aquaculture-Crustacea, Brigham Young

University, Laie, Hawaii, 9-11 February, 1983.

Moctezuma, M. A. and Blake, B.F. 1981. Burrowing activity in Penaeus vannamei Boone from

the Caimanero-Huizache Lagoon system on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci.,

(2):312-317.

Moller, T. H. and Jones, D. A. 1975. Locomotory rhythm and burrowing habits of Penaeus

semisulcatus (de Haan) and Penaeus monodon (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Penaeidae). J.

Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 18:61-77.

Norusis, M. J. 1993. SPSS for Windows Base system users guide release 6.0. Chicago, USA.

Phillips, N. W. 1984. Role of different microbes and substrates as potential suppliers of

specific, essential nutrients to marine detritivores. Bulletin of Marine Science, 35(3):283-

Pruder, G. D., Duerr, E. O., Walsh, W. A., Lawrence, A. L. and Bray, W. A. 1992. The technical

feasibility of pond liners for rearing Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) in terms of

survival, growth, water exchange rate and effluent water quality. Aquacul. Eng., 11:183-

Ruello, N. V. 1973. Burrowing, feeding and spatial distribution of the school prawn Metapenaeus

macleayi (Haswell) in the Hunter River region, Australia. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.,

:189-206.

Solorzano, L. 1969. Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite

method. Limnol. Oceanogr., 14: 799-801.

Spotte, S. 1979. Fish and invertebrate culture. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 179 pp.

Strickland, J. D. H. and Parsons, T. R. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis, 2nd ed.

Bull. 167, Fish. Res. Board Can., Ottawa, 310 pp.

Subrahmanyam, C. B. and Oppenheimer, C. H. 1969. Food preference and growth of grooved

penaeid shrimp. In: H. W. Youngken, Jr. (ed.), Food-Drugs from the Sea Proceedings

Marine Technology Society, Washington, D. C., USA, pp. 65-75.

Wickins, J. F. 1976. The tolerance of warm-water prawns to recirculated water.Acuaculture

:19-37.

Williams, A. B. 1958. Substrate as a factor in shrimp distribution. Limnol. Oceanogr., 3(3):283-

Yasuda, K. and Kitao, T. 1980. Bacterial flora in the digestive tract of prawns, Penaeus japonicus

Bate. Aquaculture, 19: 229-234.

How to Cite

L. Lawrence, G. A., Samocha, T. M., & H. Neill, W. (2019). 2HEFECTO DE SUELOS DE DIFERENTES GRANJAS DE CAMARON DE TEXAS EN EL CRECIMIENTO DE Penaeus vannamei. Avances En Nutrición Acuicola. Retrieved from https://nutricionacuicola.uanl.mx/index.php/acu/article/view/341